Serg wrote:
"I can be positive with TTW or hepatitis G viruses by PCR test, for example. But this does not mean that i have a "disease", because such viruses will not cause symptoms for me (like cirrhosis). Analogically, if HCV will not cause symptoms for me - what is the reason to define such situation as a "disease"? Of course, for such proportion of patients, who will develop cirrhosis/extrahepatic manifestations during lifetime - HCV is a disease. But many infected people will not develop symptoms."
The circular logic of this argument is counterproductive.
Serg, If you don't believe you have a disease, may I ask what benefit or purpose there is to your participation here?
Your argument seems to be that the only rationale for treatment, or credible indicator of 'disease' would be if one is actually dying of cirrhosis - which is exactly the operative assumption of Big Phama and Big Insurance for denying treatment to Hep C patients until one is by their definition "sick enough".
Frankly, if I were Big Pharma/Big Insurance, your argument would be precisely the one I would be making.
Failed Interferon 96', G1a, VL = 9 - 5.5 Million, F3/A3, AST 111, ALT 190, Generic DAA treatment Sof/Led (Mylan - India MYHEP LVIR) - 8 June, 2016
2 Week Results 20 June, 2016 AST 19, ALT 32
4 Week Results 06 July, 2016 AST 22, ALT 30, VL = 35
6 Week Results 20, July 2016 VL only = HCV RNA Detected, Non-Quantifiable <15
8 Week Results 04 August 2016, Labs, LFTs Normal, VL = UND
12 Week Results 31 August, 2016 LFTs Normal, VL = UND
EOT + 4 Weeks, LFTs Normal, VL = UND, "SVR4"
SVR12, 21 Nov 2016. CURED!!!