Home › Forums › Main Forum › Experts Corner › 24 week Sof, Led with 12 week Riba
- This topic has 6 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 1 month ago by LondonGirl.
-
AuthorPosts
-
25 October 2015 at 1:31 pm #2717
I found a very detailed EMA research document (which I have linked to somewhere on this forum), which makes clear that doses for these meds should, strictly, be patient weight-related. But, because of the impractical nature of actioning this, the pharma co’s came up with a happy medium ‘one size fits all’ pill. Dr Freeman has also posted here on this, and his views on structuring dosages for more ‘extreme’ body weights would be useful. It might be that lower-weight patients could start on the standard dose, but adjust their dosage (using a pill splitter) if the side-effects were extreme.
25 October 2015 at 1:45 pm #2718IThank-you Alsdad – I shall go In search of your / Dr F’s link! When you think that I am 2 stone less than half your weight for example, it seems kind of crazy to me that we would have the same dose!
It would still be interesting for me to know people’s rough build , eg light, medium, heavy build I know frame and body mass are considered for example, when deciphering the ‘ideal’ weight for your size /height.
Everything about me is small,; bones, height , frame, shoe size but weight has severely dropped with muscle-loss now too. I eat loads, it just doesn’t stay ! Everything seems geared towards losing weight, it’s hard to find much on gaining weight. I want to gain some weight before starting treatment, have been trying, but over a concerted effort for over a year, I have managed to gain 1 – 2 kgs. I want to gain weight for me, as a person, not just for treatment, although I just know it would be helpful. I sometimes worry about absorption of Meds too, as I don’t seem to absorb anything much at all!
Would like to add, this will NOT deter me from treating, but may help in organising time to start with work/life responsibilities etc
GT1a Dec14 F2/8.7 VL 900000-2.5M
Jan16 Hepcivir-L MonkMed/Redemption
Baseline: VL 913575 Alt 76 Platelets low
Wk2 VL1157 Alt 23
DET Wk 8 VL 32 Alt19 ‘In the slow lane’
June16 Fibro 5.7 F0/1 LIF 1.5
Wk 11 VL<12 Alt 13 Det/Unq
Extending tx 12 wks Mylan Sofo/Dac MonkMed
Wk 14 VL <12 Det/Unq
Wk 16 VL UNDETECTED
Wk 22 + 4 Wks Sunprevir FixHepC
Wk 24 UNDETECTED Alt 13
Wk 12 post tx SVR12 Wk 26 SVR24
Thank-you Tim, Dr Debasis @ MonkMed & Dr Freeman @ Fix HepC25 October 2015 at 2:16 pm #2719This is a link to the Sovaldi PDF document:
25 October 2015 at 3:18 pm #2721And here are the links to PDF documents for Daklinza and Harvoni:
27 October 2015 at 12:59 am #2808First of please understand that all the trial data you read is typically based on a “one size fits all” dose. Unless there is a good side effect reason to vary….don’t vary, take the recommended dose.
Now on to theory.
For every drug there is what is known as a therapeutic index. Making the rash assumption that everyone knows alcohol we see that the theory “if a little is good, more must be better” does not necessarily hold.
Alcohol is a drug and we see three general things:
The first has the technical name “Therapeutic Index”. With alcohol this looks like:
- Low dose – not much happens
- Medium dose – happy
- High dose – punchy, miserable or beer goggles issues
- Overdose – steering the toilet or lying in the gutter unconcious
We also see the second thing called “Tolerance”
- As a teenager a couple of drinks might have got you to medium dose happy
- Push that for a while consistently and your dose requirement might increase to a bottle of wine
- Continue long enough and the bottle will need to be Scotch
We also see the third thing, often disguised by tolerance:
- Small people can’t drink as much and get drunk on less
So how does this relate to real drugs, as in medications?
So given a promising new drug the first task is to work out the therapeutic index.
The phase 1 study of Sofosbuvir might for example of experimented with doses like (for 75 kg average body weight)
- 0.66 mg/kg 50 mg – does not work
- 1.33 mg/kg 100 mg – just works
- 2.66 mg/kg 200 mg – really works
- 5.33 mg/kg 400 mg – really works
- 10.66 mg/kg 800 mg – really works
- 21.33 mg/kg 1600 mg – really works but getting sides
- 42.6 mg/kg 3200 mg – really works unacceptable sides
So on that basis we would decide 200-800mg looks good.
400 mg is best because if that works in a 75 kg person (at 5.33 mg/kg) then a 150 kg person would get 2.66 mg/kg (works) and a 37.5 kg person would get 10.66 mg/kg (works). When the therapeutic index is wide a one dose fits all dose is convenient for manufacturers who then only have to make, and pay for regulatory approval for one dose.
Tolerance to a medication develops for a number of reasons but to keep it simple we will just consider metabolism. You liver has some general purpose garbage collection enzymes (Cytochrome P450). CYP3A4 is one example and helps remove daclatasvir from your system. Our bodies are reasonably clever and run a kind of “just in time” metabolism increasing the levels of garbage collection enzymes in response to need.
By way of example a 50 kg jockey was taking Sof/Dac and still getting sides 2 weeks in. Of his own volition he halved the dose of Dac and the sides went away. At 2/3 dose they came back mildly and at 3/4 dose more. Worried about not taking the full dose he gradually got back to the full 60 mg dose over time – being able to do this probably represented the development of tolerance.
YMMV
1 November 2015 at 2:10 am #3130A very interesting and pertinent question.
Like you, LondonGirl, though not particularly short I am quite a lightweight and find it difficult to put any mass on. Having had a run if hep C-unrelated health issues this year has seen me spending much of the time since March lying down, which of course hasn’t helped.
Its not only weight which is a factor in dosage, but also age and the effect of a decreased metabolism. My 92 yo mother cannot tolerate even the smallest dosage of blood pressure meds sometimes and must try and cut the pills otherwise it falls to disturbingly low levels.
GT1a since 1988, diagnosed 1990
F0, tx naive
VL 262,000 ALT 40 AST 26 GGT 13 Fibroscan 04/12/15 – 2.9
Started Mesochem sof/dac 12 weeks 01/01/2016
11/02/2016 – 6 weeks UNDETECTED
AST 26
ALT 261 November 2015 at 10:59 am #3150Agreed Zhuk, I had an extremely bad reaction to taking one Ibuprofen for lower back pain at night, it made me extremely ill, first and last time I’ll take that poison! We are all different, one size fits all approach is, ‘interesting’ !
Yes, very interesting post from Dr F above.
GT1a Dec14 F2/8.7 VL 900000-2.5M
Jan16 Hepcivir-L MonkMed/Redemption
Baseline: VL 913575 Alt 76 Platelets low
Wk2 VL1157 Alt 23
DET Wk 8 VL 32 Alt19 ‘In the slow lane’
June16 Fibro 5.7 F0/1 LIF 1.5
Wk 11 VL<12 Alt 13 Det/Unq
Extending tx 12 wks Mylan Sofo/Dac MonkMed
Wk 14 VL <12 Det/Unq
Wk 16 VL UNDETECTED
Wk 22 + 4 Wks Sunprevir FixHepC
Wk 24 UNDETECTED Alt 13
Wk 12 post tx SVR12 Wk 26 SVR24
Thank-you Tim, Dr Debasis @ MonkMed & Dr Freeman @ Fix HepC -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.