Welcome, Guest

TOPIC: Issues with exam results

Issues with exam results 4 years 2 months ago #26076

Mar Offline Administrator Posts: 287 Thank you received: 765 Karma: 11	The # 0 rule seems to carry the most wisdom Like Dr James advised, getting rid of the Hep C virus as soon as possible seems like the most urgent thing to do John. Then you can worry about weight loss and the fibrosis, there is a lot of evidence that the liver starts reversing the fibrosis on its own once you get rid of the Hep C virus. Weight loss is then going to hasten that.
	The administrator has disabled public write access. The following user(s) said Thank You: hanknassi

Issues with exam results 4 years 1 month ago #26078

JohnSmith Offline Senior Member Posts: 44 Thank you received: 128 Karma: 2	The wife priority was the best So, in other words, it’s not an issue to start the treatment with a 42 BMI. This won’t interfere with the treatment and with the recovery. Right? Thanks again!
	The administrator has disabled public write access. The following user(s) said Thank You: hanknassi, Mar

Issues with exam results 4 years 1 month ago #26079

DrJames Offline Platinum Member Posts: 1980 Thank you received: 7261 Karma: 111	Hi John, No, it should not be a problem for the treatment per se. Long-term, carrying the extra weight wears out your lower back, hips and knees and we only get issued with one set per person. I'm happy to share the standard advice I give patients about how to move the needle and keep it moving.
	YMMV The administrator has disabled public write access. The following user(s) said Thank You: hanknassi, Mar, JohnSmith

Issues with exam results 4 years 1 month ago #26083

JohnSmith Offline Senior Member Posts: 44 Thank you received: 128 Karma: 2	I’ve just downloaded your book and it’s certanly helping me a lot! Thank you very much for your help!
	The administrator has disabled public write access. The following user(s) said Thank You: DrJames, hanknassi, Mar

Issues with exam results 4 years 1 month ago #26084

JohnSmith
Offline
Senior Member
Posts: 44
Thank you received: 128
Karma: 2

First of all, congratulations for your result! It’s amazing! I’m really glad for you!

I forgot to ask you if the MRI you had was a regular MRI, a gardolinium MRI or a MRA.
Tigerfan wrote:

Yesterday I (i) received my 4 week VL results reflecting HCV as undetected, and (ii) had a full abdominal MRI Scan to determine my liver damage after 40 years of the virus.

While the technician was scanning my liver (which I could see in the screen on the wall), I joked that I didn't see any damage. The technician didn't either. If I understood the call from the NP this morning, both he and the radiologist thinks my liver is pristine--no damage at all. I will see the results of the scan in a few days.

After a liver biopsy in 2003, I was diagnosed as F-2. After 15 more years of the virus, I was prepared for more serious damage.

So, to follow up the previous poster, is there something odd/unreliable/inconsistent, etc. with these diagnostic tests?

The administrator has disabled public write access.

The following user(s) said Thank You: DrJames, hanknassi, Mar

Issues with exam results 4 years 1 month ago #26087

Tigerfan
Offline
Junior Member
Posts: 25
Thank you received: 98
Karma: 2

John-

The test is labeled a "US Abdomen Complete".

Do you have any insight as to the reliability of this test?

1970's-Bad behavior as a teenager.
2001- Insurance Company denies coverage due to HCV positive
2002- Another HCV positive reading and referral to liver doctor.
2003-Commence Interferon Combination treatment. VL 205,088 after 3 months. Doctor says stop.
2007-VL 1,045,320.
2017-VL 3,121,174.
2.5.18-Commenced generic Epclusa.
3.7.18- VL Undetected!
3.13.18-US Abdomen Complete scan reflects "Normal echogenicity with no mass detected. No dilated intrahepatic biliary ducts".
8.1.18- VL Undetected!

The administrator has disabled public write access.

The following user(s) said Thank You: hanknassi, Mar

Issues with exam results 4 years 1 month ago #26088

JohnSmith
Offline
Senior Member
Posts: 44
Thank you received: 128
Karma: 2

No. I had the same exam and I'm trying to look everywhere for information. I know that doctors say it's useless for detecting fibrosis, but my guess is that could show liver alterations and perhaps portal hypertension by alterations that are signs of cirrhosis, but I don't think it could show cirrhosis stage 1 that most changes are not visible yet and it's reversible.

Let me be clear that I have no idea what I'm talking about. It's just a wild guess, but I couldn't find anything for sure.

The only think I know for sure is that after 40 years with the virus and an MRI like that, you're gonna be ok

The administrator has disabled public write access.

The following user(s) said Thank You: DrJames, hanknassi, Mar

Issues with exam results 4 years 1 month ago #26089

Tigerfan
Offline
Junior Member
Posts: 25
Thank you received: 98
Karma: 2

A July, 2002 study published in the Digest of Liver Diseases concludes as follows:

"Assessment of liver echogenicity is of value for detection or exclusion of moderate to pronounced fatty infiltration (correct classification 86.6%), but cannot be relied upon in diagnosing fibrosis, not even cirrhosis in asymptomatic patients with mild to moderately elevated transaminases".

So, I may just walk down to the GI Clinic and see if they will sell me a $65 Fibroscan in the next few weeks.

1970's-Bad behavior as a teenager.
2001- Insurance Company denies coverage due to HCV positive
2002- Another HCV positive reading and referral to liver doctor.
2003-Commence Interferon Combination treatment. VL 205,088 after 3 months. Doctor says stop.
2007-VL 1,045,320.
2017-VL 3,121,174.
2.5.18-Commenced generic Epclusa.
3.7.18- VL Undetected!
3.13.18-US Abdomen Complete scan reflects "Normal echogenicity with no mass detected. No dilated intrahepatic biliary ducts".
8.1.18- VL Undetected!

The administrator has disabled public write access.

The following user(s) said Thank You: DrJames, hanknassi, Mar

Issues with exam results 4 years 1 month ago #26091

JohnSmith
Offline
Senior Member
Posts: 44
Thank you received: 128
Karma: 2

That’s what I’ve been reading everywhere but my doctor excluded my supposed cirrhosis detected by fibroscan using an MRI. I don’t think both of our doctors would order an “useless” expansive exam for no reason. It doesn’t measure the fibrosis level but it certanly do something related to our case.

EDIT: The study you’ve mentioned is related to echogenecy in ultrasound. Has nothing to do with MRI.

Last Edit: 4 years 1 month ago by JohnSmith.

The administrator has disabled public write access.

The following user(s) said Thank You: DrJames, hanknassi, Mar