Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Hepatitis Australia definitely do receive money from Pharma.
In the Hepatitis Australia Annual Report 2013/14
If you scroll down to page 42 to the “2 Revenue and other income” you will see in 2014
Government Grants: 884,687
Sponsorship 203,046And on page 48 it looks like Helen got paid $153,248 in the 2014 year.
And page 53 rather seals the case where the sponsors are listed as being:
- Abbvie
- BMS
- Gilead
- Janssen
- MSD
- Roche
YMMV
Yes, you are correct – these are fake. We can see a barcode on one but not on the other.
I am told that 1/2 the initial production run went to Nepal and that there are currently only about 1200 in India and the allocated distributors are yet to receive them.
Caveat Emptor…..
YMMV
Data on this is going to be largely absent but if it was me I would be chasing 24 weeks Sofosbuvir + Daclatasvir + Simeprevir +/- Riba (maybe)
Simeprevir is available on the PBS but only in combination with Interferon/Riba, however if you have a helpful consultant they could probably prescribe it to you and you might choose to not self inject the Interferon and perhaps not take the Riba.
At the worst with S+D+S you would get 24 weeks viral suppression and a good quality of life.
YMMV
Yes, indeed. Tonight the new automated software will get rolled out of testing and into production. With any luck it should reduce the 200 emails a day that say more of less the same thing: “Where are my medications?” by providing real time tracking links like you get for Fedex/DHL/EMS etc.
YMMV
Unless you have cirrhosis or recurrent treatment failure Sof/Dac should be good for 95% cure rate. I would see how it goes and retreat if you are the unlucky 1, or in the majorit lucky 19.
Don’t guild the Lily. Do enough the first time and more if retreatment is needed.
YMMV
Yes, and it will happen like this.
First there was brand name medication for $84,000 and some people got treated
And then there were generics for $1000-$2000 and many more people got treated <<< We are here And then many factories started to make good generics and prices fell And then Hep C went the way of smallpox.
YMMV
There are many data points you can record. We will primarily record GT, fibrosis, medications, duration and results @ VL4, SVR4, SVR12.
The goal is simply to answer the question “If I have this GT and this level of fibrosis, what do I take, for how long, to get the best chance of cure?”
Are there any other questions that need answering?
YMMV
OMG, what wonderful news. Greg is the man. New hope for so many heppers. I do hope USA will be next on the easier to ship list.
YMMV
28 October 2015 at 12:42 am in reply to: Please check for medication interactions (+ website link) #2880It will not cause any problems with your medication. The 1/2 life is 2 hours so the levels in your blood look like
0 1
2 1/2
4 1/4
6 1/8
8 1/16
10 1/32
12 1/64
14 1/128
16 1/256
18 1/512
20 1/1024
22 1/2048
24 1/4096etc. In other words it takes very little time to get rid of it from your system.
YMMV
First of please understand that all the trial data you read is typically based on a “one size fits all” dose. Unless there is a good side effect reason to vary….don’t vary, take the recommended dose.
Now on to theory.
For every drug there is what is known as a therapeutic index. Making the rash assumption that everyone knows alcohol we see that the theory “if a little is good, more must be better” does not necessarily hold.
Alcohol is a drug and we see three general things:
The first has the technical name “Therapeutic Index”. With alcohol this looks like:
- Low dose – not much happens
- Medium dose – happy
- High dose – punchy, miserable or beer goggles issues
- Overdose – steering the toilet or lying in the gutter unconcious
We also see the second thing called “Tolerance”
- As a teenager a couple of drinks might have got you to medium dose happy
- Push that for a while consistently and your dose requirement might increase to a bottle of wine
- Continue long enough and the bottle will need to be Scotch
We also see the third thing, often disguised by tolerance:
- Small people can’t drink as much and get drunk on less
So how does this relate to real drugs, as in medications?
So given a promising new drug the first task is to work out the therapeutic index.
The phase 1 study of Sofosbuvir might for example of experimented with doses like (for 75 kg average body weight)
- 0.66 mg/kg 50 mg – does not work
- 1.33 mg/kg 100 mg – just works
- 2.66 mg/kg 200 mg – really works
- 5.33 mg/kg 400 mg – really works
- 10.66 mg/kg 800 mg – really works
- 21.33 mg/kg 1600 mg – really works but getting sides
- 42.6 mg/kg 3200 mg – really works unacceptable sides
So on that basis we would decide 200-800mg looks good.
400 mg is best because if that works in a 75 kg person (at 5.33 mg/kg) then a 150 kg person would get 2.66 mg/kg (works) and a 37.5 kg person would get 10.66 mg/kg (works). When the therapeutic index is wide a one dose fits all dose is convenient for manufacturers who then only have to make, and pay for regulatory approval for one dose.
Tolerance to a medication develops for a number of reasons but to keep it simple we will just consider metabolism. You liver has some general purpose garbage collection enzymes (Cytochrome P450). CYP3A4 is one example and helps remove daclatasvir from your system. Our bodies are reasonably clever and run a kind of “just in time” metabolism increasing the levels of garbage collection enzymes in response to need.
By way of example a 50 kg jockey was taking Sof/Dac and still getting sides 2 weeks in. Of his own volition he halved the dose of Dac and the sides went away. At 2/3 dose they came back mildly and at 3/4 dose more. Worried about not taking the full dose he gradually got back to the full 60 mg dose over time – being able to do this probably represented the development of tolerance.
YMMV
All going to plan you will notice by week 2. Check your viral load at week 4 to confirm your feelings.
YMMV
Hepatitis A (viral) and Typhoid (Salmonella Typhi bacteria) are both faecal oral – clean water (bottled), no salad and chances of getting it are low. Faecal oral is the medically polite way of saying “eat shit and die”. I bet you never knew where that phrase came from? This is where.
Hepatitis B is spread via bodily fluids exchange so safe sex and not sharing needles with IVDU minimise risk
ADT (Acellular Diphtheria and Tetanus) is a cheap and cheerful vaccination good to boost every 5-10 years regardless.
If you were planning a day trip chances are you don’t need these. If you were staying longer not a bad option.
Did I mention the time I stayed in for a year in the Solomon Islands and decided I did not need malaria prophylaxis anymore? After I actually got malaria I realised I was wrong. If you’re wondering it’s like an “I wish I was dead” dose of flu. Actually it was more like “I wish I had continued to take my Doxy” dose of reality check.
So short stay with care, you should be ok to skip things. Long stay… get the lot.
YMMV
Yes, they are remarkably consistent.
YMMV
HCV is badly named. It definitely infects Langerhans Cells – these do antigen presentation so …..
Get treated!
YMMV
-
AuthorPosts