Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
I am shocked, saddened and very angry that this has happened. Difficult to get my head around why someone as wonderful as James Freeman can be subjected to this nonsense. I credit not only James and the generics but also the many friends I have made on the forum, getting me through a very difficult time in my life. My son is somewhat of a computer “geek” so I’m sure he will find ways around it all for me.
I agree that even though the medication is now listed on the PBS there will be very few people like I was (not sick enough to be treated) that will miss out.
I think I have said before on this Forum that I have no time nor faith in ANY politician or some of our Government bodies and this has only cemented that belief more.
YMMV
Sonix wrote:
Shit. Sam the eagle.
Yep.
[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJAYsKjJtM4[/video]
And some more classics from Sam
[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wBuDGHd2Qkg[/video]
[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tk6pd2_M8GU[/video]
YMMV
MexicoBound,
The 60Mg filled about 1/4 of a 00 capsule.
You must repack the daclatasvir at a weight of 66 mg – this is required to get the 60 mg of free base. If you don’t you will be under dosing.
This will use 5.6g of the 8g you have purchased.
You should not take the remaining 2.4 g in isolation ie without Sofosbuvir where the 34 g is the correct quantity for 84 x 400 mg
YMMV
# magic with no space…..
YMMV
The story I heard was that the Health Minister wrote to Gilead asking to be added to the list of 91 approved countries for generics.
Having not received the courtesy of a reply he authorised local production…..
YMMV
Tina that’s fantastic news!! So happy for you
YMMV
With any new drug many impacts are unknown.
If you search for “sofosbuvir semen” on Google you will only find 2 results.
Sofosbuvir was previously known as PSI-7977 and GSI-7977 so you should also search for
pharmasset psi-7977 semen
gilead gsi-7977 semen
The last search yields this result: http://www.natap.org/2014/EASL/nejmoa1316366_protocol.pdf however the excretion in semen refers to Ribavirin.
Anyway in the absence of documentation saying it’s not in semen you would be safest to refrain from trying to have children during treatment. The logic for how long to wait after treatment see:
YMMV
Realistically generics are only a tiny contributor and represent one component of competition, but logically only a trivial part because if you have to chase generics, then by definition you’re not in the (potentially) funded population.
And it’s not undercutting pricing from Abbvie that’s driving it either – their volumes are down too.
http://www.bidnessetc.com/58797-gilead-sciences-inc-and-abbvie-face-declining-hcv-scripts/
Effectively bankrupting the major payers like the VA and Medicaid is the primary cause.
Gilead and other pharmaceutical companies are strangling the geese that lay the golden eggs.
YMMV
I know this is out there Doc but is there a therapeutic dose that could be considered for G3’s who relapse just to keep the virus in check once it’s cleared ?
In the dose scoping trials (with PEG+Riba) the 200 mg dose of Sof saw only 94% UND at EOT, but with 400 mg it was 100%. SVR rates were 90% and 91%.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3968818/table/table1-1756283X13515825/
Conclusion: We see virological breakthrough in 6% of patients on low (200 mg) dose Sof so 400 mg daily is where it needs to be.
YMMV
Gilead’s share price is down 32% from a peak of $122.21 on 23 June 2015 pre generics to $83.62 today – post generics.
Current market cap of $112 billion was $164 billion last year, so $52 billion dollars worth of greed has now dissolved before investors eyes.
$50 billion – that’s $50,000,000,000 in investor losses, and last year 500,000 patients died of a now curable illness.
Coincidentally it works out at an investor loss of $100,000 per patient death, more or less exactly the same as the cost per cure.
Karma?
YMMV
You can’t change it, but we can. What would you like it to be
YMMV
Also booked in for 1st July for a colonoscopy. I am not that big on anatomy, but It’s not anatomically possible they could have a look at the old liver while the camera is up there, is it
If your doctor can see your liver it would mean he had accidentally pushed the scope through your bowel and perforated it. This is bad!
YMMV
The file doesnt attach in the right format
Hi Meg,
What format are you trying to send?
YMMV
Will cirrhosis a few percent below 90%, without a few percent above 90%. Exactly as expected from prior trials.
Past failure and cirrhosis remain small negative predictors of success.
The past failure is probably just a surrogate marker for IL28 TT or CT or other patient based immune issues.
YMMV
-
AuthorPosts