Thank you all. Been measuring BP every now and again , diastolic was in the range from 65 to 85. Suppose should get a monitor and measure it consistently over a few days.
I am fairly sporty 44 yo with not an ounce of unwanted fat on me and my nutrition does not have obvious downsides apart from high dietary cholesterol. That is conscious decision as to the best of my knowldege dietary cholesterol accounts only for about 5% of daily cholesterol input; most of it is made in liver so limiting dietary fat while there is no need to lose weight or decrease calorie content seems counterproductive. Specially as replacements of high fat natural products tend to be artificially created / modified products of which I have deep mistrust. To be honest major factor is that they dont taste nice !
Shall ask a doctor to do my cholesterol levels.

I came across some discussion in which it said that 2 months of additional treatment results in very similar outcomes as three so I may go for 20 weeks instead of 24 .. or even 18..

I see. I was still “detected” at 4 weeks so treatment extending was on the cards. Can I ask you what is your opinion on treatment extension in my case ?

I am not sure it is anything to do with generics. My guess would be they are very overworked so they try to get rid of anything they don’t absolutely have to do. Do you know they have 10 minutes for consultation here ? All including notes , greeting etc. I work in NHS in other area and can attest to the whole system being in shambles. How long do GPs have in Australia for consultation?
On another note – they said my liver looked perfectly smooth and healthy on the ultrasound. I am obviously very happy. I can not understand how it reconciles with my fibroscan though as surely there must be changes visible on ultrasound with a score like that ? Could you please advise me on possible reasons for this discrepancy ? I shall try to get in touch with hepatologist but I envisage it being a serious challenge.